What do internal meetings actually cost your business?
Four inputs. Real numbers. We'll show you the annual £ cost of your team's meeting rhythm and what a 30% trim would save.

Your meeting rhythm
Your numbers
Annual cost of internal meetings
£62,100
Wage cost of internal meetings across the team for a full UK working year (46 working weeks).
Working weeks lost
37
One meeting costs
£169
Cut 30% of meeting time
You would save about £18,630 a year.
What this means
Material money
An Assessment maps which meetings to cut, which to shorten, and which to replace with async updates.
Get the four meeting cuts we make first
A one-page follow-up: which meetings tend to go first inside an Assessment, the async patterns we replace them with, and a 30-day rollout. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Free
Personal score + 3 quick wins to try
The 9-question AI readiness quiz. Two minutes, no sign-up. We send your score and three small things you can try this week.
Take the free quizFrom £799
AI workflow assessment
60-minute interview, 48-hour custom report with named tools, exact steps and a 7-day plan. Money-back if we don’t surface 5+ hours a week.
Book an Assessment £799Done for you
Done-for-you Agent Build
We design, build, and hand over the AI agent. Scoped on a call, priced by complexity band. Best for owners short on time, not ideas.
See Agent BuildHow this works
Most UK SMEs underestimate meeting cost by a factor of two. A 45-minute meeting with five people costs about £170 in wage time alone. Run that twice a week and you have £17,000 a year going into the same room.
We take your four inputs and multiply them out: people × meeting length × meetings per week × hourly rate × 46 working weeks. Forty-six is the UK working year — 52 minus 4 weeks holiday minus roughly 2 weeks of bank holidays and sick. We round the headline to the nearest £10.
The 30% reduction estimate is the kind of trim we typically find in an Assessment — usually one standing meeting replaced with a shared doc and one weekly call replaced with a 5-minute Loom. It’s a sense-check, not a precise measurement.